Asia-Pacific

Quarter of ASEAN Companies Disclosing Climate Risk Strategy

Most companies are reporting their emissions, but climate-related targets remain vague, says GRI. 

Just 26% of 420 listed companies across the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region have outlined how long-term climate change factors have informed their climate risk strategy, according to a new report by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).  

The report, created in collaboration with the National University of Singapore (NUS), assessed the climate-related disclosures made by companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam since 2020.  

Eighty-four percent reported on climate-related topics that are most material to them, the report said, adding that three-quarters have reported on their contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In particular, Thai and Indonesian companies disclosed their progress against the SDGs, at 95% and 93% respectively. 

There is no common sustainability reporting framework across the ASEAN region, GRI said. The use of frameworks such as the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) is very low, with none them being used by more than a fifth of assessed companies.  

Dr. Allinnettes Adigue, the GRI’s ASEAN Region Head, said: “It is encouraging that our research with NUS finds many large businesses in the region are reporting on climate – although more progress is needed. With 85% of the companies relying on the GRI Standards for their climate disclosure, it demonstrates the importance of robust and globally-applicable reporting frameworks.” 

Discrepancies abound 

There are regional discrepancies between disclosures on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the report said.  

Sixty-two percent of all assessed companies disclose their emissions, with the Philippines leading the way at 80%, and Vietnamese companies falling behind at 5%. That is 55% less than the next worst country – Malaysia – at 60%.  

Of the 420 companies, 19% reported their Scope 1 emissions disaggregated by source type, 10% reported their Scope 1 emissions disaggregated by facility, and 18% reported their Scope 2 emissions disaggregated by source type.  

Just 22% of companies have set targets related to increasing their low-carbon energy consumption, 10% on achieving net-zero carbon emissions and only five on reducing methane emissions.  

Fifty-six percent of businesses were found to have identified climate change opportunities, but only 47% have disclosed their climate risk mitigation plans. While three-in-four companies disclosed metrics on climate-related performance, less than half (46%) outlined how climate-related targets have been selected. Just 8% of companies directly link management remuneration to climate performance.  

To Top
Newsletter SignupReceive all the latest stories from the ESG Investor editorial team

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter below and never miss a story.

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap